{"id":2549,"date":"2002-04-11T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2002-04-11T05:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.greatsociety.org\/?p=2549"},"modified":"2018-10-31T21:37:56","modified_gmt":"2018-11-01T01:37:56","slug":"london-vampire-vs-lesbian-gambler","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/greatsociety.org\/?p=2549","title":{"rendered":"London Vampire vs. Lesbian Gambler"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>My old friend James had a bee in his bonnet, as we say back at the 34th<br \/>\nRifles. The 34th had been removed from the Front Lines after we were<br \/>\ndecimated at&#8230;<br \/>\nOkay, you caught me, I&#8217;m lying. It&#8217;s been a long time since<br \/>\nsomeone caught me lying, and I hope you are very proud of yourself.<br \/>\nYou&#8217;ll be excused from lessons for the remainder of seventh period.<\/p>\n<p>My old friend James was on the move. Instead of a nameless bar in a<br \/>\nsoulless city, though, we ended up at his rather posh Bethesda<br \/>\napartment where he had two DVD&#8217;s waiting. They were titles that didn&#8217;t<br \/>\nreally go together: 1999&#8217;s indie Britflick <em>Croupier<\/em> and a favorite piece of crap from 1970, the obscure <em>Vampyros Lesbos<\/em>, which Quentin Tarentino will tell you is a schlock cinema classic.<\/p>\n<p>While I have the utmost respect for Tarantino&#8217;s work, I like to temper<br \/>\nmy support. He&#8217;s blended entertaining storytelling with a deep respect<br \/>\nfor what has come before. There&#8217;s nothing original in his work but, by<br \/>\nbringing it through the door with an American voice, it&#8217;s nothing but<br \/>\noriginal. That thought confuses some folks. The short of it is: I only<br \/>\nwatch Lesbos for the tits.<\/p>\n<p>James selected the two films for reasons that, in his mind, seemed clear. <em>Croupier<\/em><br \/>\nfollows the twisted tale of a young author, Jack Manfred. He&#8217;s<br \/>\nsuffering from near terminal writer&#8217;s block. In the hopes of breaking<br \/>\nthe block, he turns to the seedy life of a casino card dealer and<br \/>\nbecomes absorbed by a strange, apathetic darkness. It&#8217;s good for his<br \/>\nwriting, though!<\/p>\n<p>Meanwhile, <em>Vampyros Lesbos<\/em> is a later evening T&amp;A<br \/>\nflick, Jesus Franco&#8217;s &#8220;Psycho-Sexadelic Horror Freakout!&#8221; Most<br \/>\nschlock-heads believe it to be one of Franco&#8217;s best turns; he&#8217;s one of<br \/>\nthe elite guards when it comes to Euro shock cinema. Ed Wood is the tip<br \/>\nof the iceberg in this sort of schlock movie making. He just made a<br \/>\nsplash because he was a cross dresser and, later, because he was played<br \/>\nby Johnny Depp. But hailing Ed Wood as the kook of our international<br \/>\ncinema greats is like saying there was only <em>one<\/em> famous Civil<br \/>\nWar general. There were many directors who made many weirdo cult films<br \/>\nand all of whom have equal and, often, greater followings than Ed.<br \/>\nJesus Franco is among that group. Coming out of Spain, he wrote, acted,<br \/>\ndirected and scored movies under any of 40 different pseudonyms. It is,<br \/>\nfor normal people, almost impossible to know how many films he was<br \/>\ninvolved in. Like Jackie Chan, his early era is shady and never<br \/>\nmentioned. Better still, he continues to make movies! You don&#8217;t see<br \/>\nthem on the big screen, and we&#8217;re down from five or six a year to one a<br \/>\nyear, but the old boy is kicking. You can&#8217;t shake a stick at lesbian<br \/>\nvampires who have an over fondness for candelabras. My temples pulsed<br \/>\nin anticipation of the 90 minutes of mind numbing, slow moving<br \/>\npseudo-terror that we had lined up after <em>Croupier<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p><em>Croupier<\/em> has lots of stuff going for it, namely Alex Kingston<br \/>\ngiving us a full frontal shot. She&#8217;s the girl from ER. It&#8217;s a neo-noir<br \/>\nfilm, which is always nice to experience when properly done. It&#8217;s<br \/>\nwitty, dark, and not at all audience friendly. That&#8217;s also nice. I&#8217;ve<br \/>\nalways identified with stories about the demented, troubled minds of<br \/>\nwriters. <em>Croupier<\/em> does that well, with plenty of Britishness<br \/>\nthrown in to make me coo like a pigeon because I am, of course, a<br \/>\nhopeless anglophile. Getting into a story about a crazy, hat-wearing<br \/>\nwriter who&#8217;s sexy to boot is what Saturday night is all about. James is<br \/>\nalmost constantly drunk these days and I can&#8217;t focus on writing to save<br \/>\nmy life, so I guess I have to kill women as an experiment, eh?<\/p>\n<p>Mike Hodges is directing. He gave us the Sandy Bullock vehicle, <em>Murder by Numbers<\/em>, as well as <em>The Terminal Man<\/em> and the excellent original version of <em>Get Carter<\/em> (which I reviewed <a href=\"http:\/\/www.greatsociety.org..\/..\/..\/..\/..\/Reviews+index-req-showcontent-id-17.html\" target=\"_blank_\">right here<\/a>).<br \/>\nPaul Mayersberg is on the screenplay. He&#8217;s a writer who has been<br \/>\ntroubled by mediocrity ever since his strange yet brilliant adaptation<br \/>\nof Tevis&#8217; <em>The Man Who Fell to Earth<\/em>. The cast are unknowns,<br \/>\ngenerally speaking from the viewpoint of the United States of Love, and<br \/>\nthe flick begins with the cool, smooth lines that only the Brits can<br \/>\ndo. It has a perfect little prologue that is followed by death, terror,<br \/>\nstruggle and rebirth. The story reads as if from a book. That&#8217;s not<br \/>\nsomething that can often be achieved, yet they manage it with finesse.<br \/>\nAnother perfect script, the narrator&#8217;s voice beginning as the house<br \/>\nlights go down. We open with: &#8220;Now, he had become the still center of<br \/>\nthat spinning wheel of misfortune.&#8221; What a great opening line. This is<br \/>\na nut-cutting study of the writer&#8217;s life, the gambling world and a<br \/>\nyoung man cut loose.<\/p>\n<p>The movie sums up Jack Manfred after 12 minutes &#8211; &#8220;Jack was up above<br \/>\nthe world, a writer looking down on his subject.&#8221; But you can&#8217;t stay<br \/>\nabove the world for long. Jack&#8217;s &#8220;professional voyeurism&#8221; won&#8217;t last.<br \/>\nThe green, sucking water at the bottom of the pit of gambling and sin<br \/>\nquickly pulls him down. It&#8217;s not really about being on the other side<br \/>\nof the chips, though. It&#8217;s all about the poison that seeps through in<br \/>\nwhat Jack believes to be detached observation. The idea that the world<br \/>\naround him is a feeder for his book, and his hopes to be a successful<br \/>\nwriter, are both mistaken dreams. His writing becomes a conduit for all<br \/>\nthe filth and depravity that crawls around on the floor of Human<br \/>\naddiction. Jack is quickly taken over by the latent schadenfreude<br \/>\npresent in every writer. What is it that drags him in? Watching people<br \/>\nlose? Bringing them down? If he cannot succeed, then his writing life<br \/>\nis over. So, he hurts those people, simply through emotional<br \/>\nnegligence. The hands-off observer in a hands-on world. But the<br \/>\nmisfortune of the people around him is what builds his novel. He<br \/>\nbecomes an addict. A sardonic, venomous addiction that brings him into<br \/>\nthe downward spiral. Of course, the great horror of the true writing<br \/>\nlife &#8211; all that is okay. It leads to production. Do words on a page<br \/>\noutweigh Humanity? The obsession, shared by writers both aspiring and<br \/>\naccomplished, is laid out early on. On the subway, Jack dreams of<br \/>\npeople reading his book. He dreams of getting into their heads. While<br \/>\nI&#8217;ve shared those thoughts, I&#8217;ve also sat next to million dollar<br \/>\nauthors who wish the same things. The power of looking across at a<br \/>\nwoman and seeing your book in her hands is indescribable. Jack opens<br \/>\nhimself to the conduit, opens himself to pollution. Everything must be<br \/>\ndone in order to move forward.<\/p>\n<p>Every writer should watch this movie, if only to learn how to drink<br \/>\nfive ounces of chilled vodka every night. It&#8217;s a novel on film, and<br \/>\npart of the increasing number of movies and books about struggling<br \/>\nwriters in an equally struggling world. It&#8217;s the natural process,<br \/>\ncaptured, displayed. If you write, you&#8217;ll recognize that big darkness.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;So Nacho says check it out!&#8221; James wants me to say as I hastily write this review and he puts in <em>Vampyros Lesbos<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>Call me crazy, but I adore this trash. Here&#8217;s the opener: The theme<br \/>\nmusic is electronically altered spoken Turkish with a groovy, funky<br \/>\nmusak background. On camera, an adorable brunette she-vamp reaches<br \/>\ntowards us as red silk scarves flutter around her. Scene one, act one,<br \/>\ncut to she-vamp in see-through negligee masturbating to her image in<br \/>\nfront of a mirror and dancing to a 70&#8217;s guitar riff. Amen, brother,<br \/>\nthis piece of crap pulls through every time.<\/p>\n<p>If you plan to enjoy the talents of Jesus Franco, Dario Argento or any<br \/>\nof the gore\/Euro-horror crew, you must be drunk. I write these<br \/>\narticles, people rent the movies and they send me emails saying, dude,<br \/>\nNacho, what the fuck did you make me do? Were they sober? Yes. That&#8217;s<br \/>\nalways the first mistake.<\/p>\n<p>In your basement? Nacho wrote a review about <em>Black Belt Jones<\/em>?<br \/>\nYou got the tape on the coffee table? Great. Now, stop! Pour yourself<br \/>\nfive ounces of vodka, smoke a joint, undo the top three buttons, have<br \/>\nanother five ounces of vodka, dim the lights, roll film. Now you&#8217;re<br \/>\ncool, baby.<\/p>\n<p>These big entertainment centers we have today&#8230; You ever notice how they<br \/>\nsit serenely in sanitized living rooms? Watch out for the leather, take<br \/>\nyour shoes off at the door, we can&#8217;t eat in here. What the fuck? I&#8217;m<br \/>\nwatching goddamned Jesus Franco! I&#8217;m rolling through the Pam Grier<br \/>\ncollection. I&#8217;m going to tackle all four Phantasms in a row and, then,<br \/>\nI&#8217;m going to blow my head off and splatter brains across your<br \/>\nwhite-washed, virginal walls. James, you see, he understands. So do I.<br \/>\nOur entertainment centers are in backrooms, forbidden chambers, the<br \/>\nhell dimension. Who&#8217;s combing the carpet while surround sound feels us<br \/>\nup? Open a window, man, because the stench of death comes from beneath<br \/>\nthat couch. Today&#8217;s special: A super death TV sits beside a pile of <em>Thrashcore<\/em><br \/>\nmagazines and vinyl punk records. Haven&#8217;t touched them in years. There<br \/>\nare some moldering Jelly Babies behind them if you&#8217;re hungry.<\/p>\n<p>Okay, I&#8217;m ranting. Back to nude vampires. A woman in black underwear<br \/>\nwrithes on the screen, I am encased in overloud 70&#8217;s guitar music, the<br \/>\nonly light in the room is from the wall of entertainment before us, and<br \/>\nJohnny Walker Black melts my ice. James drinks his straight. The room<br \/>\nis choked with the smoke from Cuban cigarillos, coffee brews in a<br \/>\nmold-coated pot sitting on the floor beside the couch. It smells like a<br \/>\ndog has slept in this room for 20 years, though James has never owned a<br \/>\npet. Jesus Franco, ladies and gentlemen; we watch in silence.<\/p>\n<p><em>Vampyros Lesbos<\/em> is the first to hit upon an oft-used idea. How<br \/>\ndo the vamps go unnoticed in the modern day? Well, they form a theater.<br \/>\nWhen in doubt, act.<\/p>\n<p>The great thing about filming on location in Istanbul is that it&#8217;s an<br \/>\nexcuse to have your funky 70&#8217;s music overwhelmed by a sitar. Oh, I&#8217;m<br \/>\nnot complaining. The soundtrack could be pots and pans banging together<br \/>\nas long as naked girls walk around covered in blood.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Let me talk for a bit during this slow part,&#8221; James said to me as he<br \/>\nrefreshed my scotch. He told me the life story of his younger sister<br \/>\nand I listened contentedly. See, you gotta be drunk, because the slow<br \/>\npart is thirteen hours long.<\/p>\n<p>Overall, with the booze settled in, I must say that Lesbos ranks far<br \/>\nbetter now that it has a proper DVD restoration. Now we have the bright<br \/>\ncolors we&#8217;ve never seen on the old beat-up VHS version. The subtitles<br \/>\nare in place and properly translated, as opposed to making up a story<br \/>\nlike the early 90&#8217;s tapes did. It&#8217;s a fairly complicated story, too.<br \/>\nBram Stoker meets Whitley Strieber. Nude chicks abound, blood pours and<br \/>\nit&#8217;s simply amazing what a sewing needle can do to an eye socket.<\/p>\n<p>James and I finished our three hour marathon on a high note. Usually<br \/>\nI&#8217;m sporting a movie headache but, this Saturday, I was feeling up<br \/>\nabove the world, a writer looking down on his subject&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>Nacho&#8217;s gin rating: Watch the first while drinking, watch the second while drunk. You&#8217;ll thank me by midnight.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[50,352],"tags":[403,353,179],"class_list":["post-2549","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-cult-culture","category-gsarchive","tag-cult-culture","tag-gs-archive-2004-2008","tag-james"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/greatsociety.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2549","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/greatsociety.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/greatsociety.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/greatsociety.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/greatsociety.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2549"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/greatsociety.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2549\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2920,"href":"https:\/\/greatsociety.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2549\/revisions\/2920"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/greatsociety.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2549"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/greatsociety.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2549"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/greatsociety.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2549"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}