{"id":2460,"date":"2004-03-22T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2004-03-22T05:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.greatsociety.org\/?p=2460"},"modified":"2018-10-31T21:20:00","modified_gmt":"2018-11-01T01:20:00","slug":"get-stuffed-comrade","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/greatsociety.org\/?p=2460","title":{"rendered":"Get Stuffed, Comrade!"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>I&#8217;m not the first to say it, but I do want to go on record. The coming<br \/>\nproblem &#8211; the future crisis &#8211; isn&#8217;t in some desert oil nation. No, our<br \/>\ndalliance with the Mideast is only a minor distraction in between<br \/>\nserious trouble. Our coming problem is the new boss, same as the old<br \/>\nboss. Russia.<\/p>\n<p>People laugh when I say that and, admittedly, I am typically<br \/>\nAmerican. I read the first sentence of a news article, say fuck it, and<br \/>\nmove on to something calm about dogs being slaughtered and eaten in<br \/>\nsoutheast DC as part of a Satanic suicide cult ritual. So maybe I&#8217;m<br \/>\nwrong. Best to assume that. But Russia&#8217;s turning bad, and I think we&#8217;re<br \/>\ndoing it on purpose.<\/p>\n<p>Oh, we&#8217;re friends now, right? Not really, sadly enough. We were moving<br \/>\nwell with Bush I and Clinton, but then we sort of stalled. Not because<br \/>\nBush II is a cunt, but because Russia is dominated by a man our media<br \/>\nopenly refers to as a &#8220;benevolent autocrat.&#8221; That&#8217;s a cute one! Hey,<br \/>\nHitler did good things, too. And, man, did Stalin know how to run a big<br \/>\nfarm. Great moustache trimmers, those two. Loved them to bits. Can&#8217;t go<br \/>\nwrong.<\/p>\n<p>Hearing Putin apologists is shocking to me. Not only is he an<br \/>\nauthoritarian fuck who has quietly moved the country away from<br \/>\ndemocracy, but he just looks evil. At the very least you&#8217;d think we&#8217;d<br \/>\ndistrust him because of that! Hell, we don&#8217;t like Fidel because of the<br \/>\nbeard, how can Putin get away with his hatchet face? What are you doing<br \/>\ntoday, Weasel Man? Killing millions? Excellent, excellent. You&#8217;re very<br \/>\nbenevolent, tra-la-la.<\/p>\n<p>Now, by and large, who fucking cares? Good point. Except we&#8217;re doing strange things.<\/p>\n<p>At the end of March, we added Bulgaria, Romania, Slovenia, Slovakia,<br \/>\nEstonia, Latvia and Lithuania to NATO which, I suppose, is reason to<br \/>\ncelebrate or something. Yay NATO. I always wonder what NATO plans to do<br \/>\nif one of the member countries actually does get into trouble. You<br \/>\nknow, World War style. If Estonia does something retarded or the<br \/>\nnon-NATO world comes in on a secret treaty to blow up Latvia, what&#8217;s<br \/>\nthe rest of NATO going to do? Are we going to rush in to help? I know<br \/>\nwhat the American public will think. You&#8217;ll have to tell us Bin Laden,<br \/>\nHitler, Attila the Hun and Ted Kaczynski are having a summit meeting<br \/>\nsomewhere in the Estonian countryside to get us in there.<\/p>\n<p>What upsets me is that every NATO guide showing a map of member nations<br \/>\nalso lists &#8220;the former Soviet Union.&#8221; Now, ain&#8217;t that a kick in the<br \/>\nteeth? And what about the new NATO states, all former Soviet dominated<br \/>\ncountries? Are they the former-former Soviet Union? The most formerest?<\/p>\n<p>NATO hasn&#8217;t existed for &#8220;North Atlantic security&#8221; since the 50&#8217;s. It&#8217;s<br \/>\na Cold War hammer and everyone knows it. That means that our slow<br \/>\nencroachment right up to the borders of Russia is either (a) A clever<br \/>\njoke which Russia does not grasp or (b) A desperate attempt to get an<br \/>\narmy in Moscow before next winter. I don&#8217;t see any other possible<br \/>\nexplanation why we need to join up with Estonia, Bulgaria, Stinkyvania<br \/>\nor any of those corrupt shadow quasi-democracies whose primary export<br \/>\nis black market human organs. So this must be some sort of April Fool&#8217;s<br \/>\nthing we&#8217;re playing on Putin. &#8220;You&#8217;re surrounded! (long pause) Ha, ha,<br \/>\nha! Come on, Vlad, I&#8217;ll buy you a drink. Whew, boy! You shoulda seen<br \/>\nyour face!&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>I wondered this same thing when the Czech Republic came in &#8212; why do we<br \/>\nneed landlocked European nations in NATO? Nations that, historically,<br \/>\nhave always been a buffer between the west and Russia? The only thing<br \/>\nwe&#8217;re doing is boxing in snarky non-NATO people. I have no doubts that<br \/>\nPutin&#8217;s &#8220;benevolent autocracy&#8221; is going to freak out at some point.<br \/>\nBeing a cynic, my conclusion is that NATO&#8217;s encroachment through Europe<br \/>\nis a big fuck you. Like, go ahead, Ivan, go nuts. We&#8217;ve got you for<br \/>\nreal this time!<\/p>\n<p>Now, I wouldn&#8217;t have noticed or cared except for the first sentence of<br \/>\nan article I read on March 29th. Russia, of course, is a bit miffed<br \/>\nabout the NATO thing. Most places report that Russia is &#8220;uncomfortable&#8221;<br \/>\nwith the expansion but &#8220;quietly tolerant.&#8221; That doesn&#8217;t jive with what<br \/>\nKonstantin Kosachyov, head of the international affairs committee in<br \/>\nRussia&#8217;s lower house of parliament said: &#8220;If significant NATO military<br \/>\nbases appear near Russia&#8217;s borders and change the balance of forces in<br \/>\nthis region, then we can&#8217;t exclude the possibility that Russia will<br \/>\nconsider the possibility of taking corresponding action so that the<br \/>\nbalance is not breached&#8230;&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Asked, does he mean nuclear expansion, his answer was, yes, if necessary.<\/p>\n<p>Oh my fucking God!<\/p>\n<p>And that slips right by? The reporter is like, hmmm, so, anyway, I love your little dolls. Meanwhile, in Iraq&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>I mean, as soon as he said yes, I expected to hear plates hit the<br \/>\nkitchen floor in the newsroom. We&#8217;re not worried? Here&#8217;s this hardcore<br \/>\nex KGB fuck running a country where democracy is quietly failing<br \/>\n(because the people are monkeys), is impoverished, suffers from<br \/>\nwidespread corruption and maintains a large military which has a &#8220;low<br \/>\nmorale.&#8221; I like it when they say that. Aw, poor guys. Poor, murdering,<br \/>\nheavily armed, convinced that they should conquer the world in the name<br \/>\nof Communism former Red Army guys. Oh, and Putin&#8217;s sitting on the<br \/>\nremnants of a military machine which, while admittedly outdated<br \/>\n(though, thanks to us, not entirely so), can still burn the world to a<br \/>\ncinder. I feel the need to remind everyone of that fact. Like, if you<br \/>\nhave the same amount of ICBM&#8217;s as Saddam had Republican Guards, which<br \/>\nshould you fear more? You have ten minutes to complete your answer.<\/p>\n<p>Rule number one: Don&#8217;t trust a country which constantly complains about<br \/>\nlow morale in their bloated military. Let&#8217;s put the shoe on the other<br \/>\nfoot. What would the world think if America were, say, tied up in a war<br \/>\nwith Cuba in an obvious attempt to control territory and keep their<br \/>\nwell-armed, low morale military distracted while, meanwhile, the<br \/>\ncountry was taken over by a &#8220;benevolent dictator&#8221; and, then, he turned<br \/>\naround and said that the encroachment of an European alliance was<br \/>\npissing him off and a &#8220;serious threat&#8221;?<\/p>\n<p>Go ahead. What would the world think? It would be mass hysteria. Yet, Russia falls below the radar.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;NATO&#8217;s steps have had an unfriendly character toward Russia.&#8221; Konstantin Kosachyov, again.<\/p>\n<p>Is he just rattling a saber? Not really.<\/p>\n<p>As you read this, we&#8217;re moving a fighter division into Lithuania.<br \/>\nWhat&#8217;s their job? Glad you asked. The American fighters will be<br \/>\nconducting regular reconnaissance missions near Russia&#8217;s border. Why?<br \/>\nNo one knows but the Candy Man.<\/p>\n<p>Also, as you read this, Russian jets are being moved into position.<br \/>\nThey&#8217;ll be flying regular missions along the border, too. One, big,<br \/>\nhappy family. Right?<\/p>\n<p>Maybe Kosachyov is just a big, bad Ruskie, eh? No, he&#8217;s moved by this: &#8220;This is a development no one wanted.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Well, somebody wants it, no? Perhaps Bush II is setting up the ultimate Kingmaker &#8211; a new Cold War.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;If a NATO plane violates the air space, shoot it down without ceremony<br \/>\nand be done with it. A warplane is a warplane. After all, they are not<br \/>\nflying for their own pleasure.&#8221; General Anatoly Kornukov. Pulls some<br \/>\nweight with the Russian Air Force which, of course, suffers from low<br \/>\nmorale.<\/p>\n<p>Meanwhile, Russia is also being boxed in by the EU, which expands dramatically in April, as well.<\/p>\n<p>Now, this is as much their fault as ours. They&#8217;ve fallen away from<br \/>\nworking closely with the West, and they seem to want nothing to do with<br \/>\nus. They&#8217;re glad for partnership, but not for these organizations. I<br \/>\ncan understand that, but the more they cold shoulder us, the more we do<br \/>\nthis kind of shit. While I don&#8217;t expect Russia to go nuts tomorrow, it<br \/>\nis beyond irresponsible for us to ignore the plight of these nations.<br \/>\nIf every nation from the Ukraine to Central Asia turns into a tripped<br \/>\nout authoritarian state run by dictators and sitting on an<br \/>\nextraordinary amount of nuclear and conventional weapons, and ruling<br \/>\nover the people who can build more, then there&#8217;s an issue. Let&#8217;s talk<br \/>\nin modern terms. These are nations that could provide the ultimate home<br \/>\nto terrorism. Those aren&#8217;t little dust bunny countries over there,<br \/>\nkids. Imagine if, say, Georgia was home to Bin Laden and Bush went in<br \/>\nto topple them&#8230; Well, day one, World War III. Not only does Georgia<br \/>\nhave full nuclear capability and a strong army, but an American, UN or<br \/>\nNATO attack would have to walk on eggshells or they&#8217;d pull all of those<br \/>\nformer Soviet Republics right down on top of them. Would Putin stand<br \/>\nidle if we had to strike deep into what he and the people of Russia<br \/>\nconsider their sphere of influence?<\/p>\n<p>Already, Georgia and the Ukraine are the next nations to stand on the<br \/>\nbalance. They are viewed as rightful parts of Russia and it&#8217;s just a<br \/>\ntiny hairline that keeps Putin from going after them. Hell, it&#8217;s just<br \/>\nthe crisis in Chechnya that keeps him from moving in. And these are<br \/>\nnations that have quietly begged us for assistance, but we casually<br \/>\nignore the situation. Europe doesn&#8217;t, but the US does, and that still<br \/>\nhurts when we blow something off. We got mad at Georgia and Ukraine<br \/>\nbecause we felt they weren&#8217;t using our financial aid to its full<br \/>\npotential, so we let them run dry and ignored further pleas.<\/p>\n<p>Georgia just went through a non-violent revolution that re-introduced<br \/>\ndemocracy, but they&#8217;re a wreck after 14 years of gunplay and goofing<br \/>\naround. If they don&#8217;t get help, they&#8217;ll sink. Plain and simple. They&#8217;ll<br \/>\neither return to Russia or become the next freaked out shithole that<br \/>\nwe&#8217;ll have to get involved in because they&#8217;re killing too many<br \/>\nchildren.<\/p>\n<p>Ukraine has elections in a few months that could very well spell doom,<br \/>\nif they&#8217;re mishandled, or success for democracy, if the west takes<br \/>\nnotice. There&#8217;s a weighty movement in the Ukraine to return to Russia,<br \/>\nand all Putin needs is an excuse to roll in there. An excuse such as,<br \/>\nsay, a tinpot tyrant fucking people over. Keep the peace. Take over.<br \/>\nEasy. Hell, we do it for breakfast.<\/p>\n<p>Oh, I&#8217;m sorry. I&#8217;m acting like I&#8217;m living life at the end of the<br \/>\nAmerican Century and everything I believed in is crumbling around me in<br \/>\nthe new and fearful America the Vincible. The truth is, though, that<br \/>\nit&#8217;s morning again in America! The Russians have just threatened a<br \/>\nmilitary buildup in response to NATO encroachment, Putin&#8217;s democratic<br \/>\nvalues are called into question with every passing minute and everyone<br \/>\nhas an axe to grind. Any day now &#8212; Cold War II! Terrorism falls by the<br \/>\nwayside and we stand toe to toe with Russia, Inc. Let&#8217;s pretend.<\/p>\n<p>Then&#8230;what happens? A new economic bubble rises and we all start<br \/>\nmaking money again. We&#8217;ll be given a new sense of purpose and duty. The<br \/>\npoor and the disenfranchised will be drafted and head out to Estonia<br \/>\nand Bulgaria to shore up the borders. Cocaine will come back into<br \/>\nfashion. Bush will become lovable and amusing instead of terrifying and<br \/>\nevil. Red Menace movies like <em>Red Dawn<\/em> and <em>Gotcha<\/em><br \/>\nwill come back into fashion (WOLVERINES!!!!), we&#8217;ll get the chance to<br \/>\nwear friendship bracelets and buy Eastern-Europe-Aid CD&#8217;s featuring all<br \/>\nof our favorite artists.<\/p>\n<p>Under the threat of M.A.D., we&#8217;ll be able to adopt a legitimate<br \/>\nfatalistic &#8220;Ground Zero&#8221; attitude that is the source of endless party<br \/>\njokes and a cavalier attitude towards life.<\/p>\n<p>We&#8217;ll stop reading about Iraq and start reading about Russian, Inc. spies every day.<\/p>\n<p>Maybe there&#8217;ll be a skirmish in Latvia? A U2 shot down! You have 30<br \/>\ndays to return the pilot&#8230;. Warships on the move. Where&#8217;s the pilot?<br \/>\nToday, we have footage of USAF Lieutenant Jerry Smith. &#8220;I love you<br \/>\nStacey, I love my daughters.&#8221; Release Jerry Smith now! Smith, Smith,<br \/>\nSmith! Jerry Smith has been released today and welcomed his family at<br \/>\nthe airport in Berlin. The Jerry Smith story and America&#8217;s struggle<br \/>\nwith Russia, Inc. Tonight on Dateline.<\/p>\n<p>There are approximately 1200 Russia, Inc. tanks on the Romanian border.<br \/>\nBut can we support a conventional war, Dr. Martinak? Well, Jim, I&#8217;m<br \/>\nglad you asked that question&#8230;.<\/p>\n<p>My fellow Americans, we once again meet the Evil Empire face to face&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>Are you now or have you ever been a member of Russia, Inc&#8217;s Corporate<br \/>\nChain of Command? Today, CEO Marty Davies denied that he had been part<br \/>\nof Russia, Inc&#8217;s Corporate structure, however he did stay at Putin&#8217;s<br \/>\nsummer mansion for two weeks in 2004. Is this true? Yes, sir, it is<br \/>\ntrue. To the roar of a crowd, Marty Davies was led away to&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>Mass protests today in Sofia as Bulgarians insist on leaving NATO&#8230;.<br \/>\nThis is Jacob Rosenstein in Bulgaria. Can you hear me Tom? Tom? Am I<br \/>\ncoming through? There are riots in the streets here&#8230;I&#8230;.I don&#8217;t know<br \/>\nif you&#8217;re seeing this&#8230;but&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>My fellow Americans. Today, as you know, Bulgaria and Romania have left NATO. This cannot go unanswered&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>Hello America, this is David Yan in Latvia. With NATO failing in<br \/>\nEastern Europe, and Russia Inc moving to occupy former NATO nations,<br \/>\nthe Baltic&#8217;s are growing nervous. Latvia is home to an ancient people&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>Save Latvia! Save Latvia!<\/p>\n<p>NATO forces, today, stream into the Baltic nations as the Czech<br \/>\nRepublic falls to Russia, Inc&#8217;s financial terrorism. Poland and the<br \/>\nBaltic&#8217;s are all that remain between Russia, Inc and Western Europe.<\/p>\n<p>We don&#8217;t like that distinction, James. Europe is one entity. We are not<br \/>\nEastern and Western. It is this thinking that has brought NATO to its<br \/>\nknees in the east&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>My God&#8230; My God&#8230; That&#8217;s&#8230; There&#8217;s&#8230; Shooting. There&#8217;s something. I don&#8217;t know if you can see the skyline. There&#8217;s&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>That was John Chen in Berlin an hour ago. We have since lost his signal&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[352],"tags":[111,353],"class_list":["post-2460","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-gsarchive","tag-commentary","tag-gs-archive-2004-2008"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/greatsociety.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2460","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/greatsociety.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/greatsociety.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/greatsociety.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/greatsociety.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2460"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/greatsociety.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2460\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2867,"href":"https:\/\/greatsociety.org\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2460\/revisions\/2867"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/greatsociety.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2460"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/greatsociety.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2460"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/greatsociety.org\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2460"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}