Ok, I'll take back some of the venom. I have one question for you people who think Bush=Hitler=Satan. Which is worse, killing people in wars for your own personal agenda or sitting back and doing nothing while millions of civilians are murdered(Clinton). Oh wait, he fired off a couple missles one day.
I'm one of those pacifists who think that a life is a life. One equals one.
I don't think it's right to kill 10,000 people to save 30 or something like that. I think it's just to lose 10,000 to save a million.
WWII, I think, was a just war. I even supported the war in Afghanistan. But Vietnam? Iraq? Bullshit. How the hell am I supposed to believe that Iraq was a formidable and impending threat to the world if we obliterated their rag-tag army in 3 weeks?
Where does the "million" figure come from? All I remember was the few missiles he threw off in some Eastern European country during the cum-stain fiasco (don't get me started on that).
The only things I know of killing millions of people currently are African dictators, tsunamis, and AIDS. As far as I know, Bush is only addressing one of those when he should be addressing all three with at least a tenth of the religious fervor that he pursued the war against Iraq.
Point? Counter-point?
