No, not close to a win. Comparatively speaking, though, it was quite a show. He beat out Wallace's popular vote -- and Wallace actually stole a few states. Wallace was a reactionary candidate, but Perot...? He rose up in a weird and stale election and managed 18%. There was no reason for that. And if he hadn't of dropped out, or picked Stockdale, he would have done miles better...and probably would have taken electorals. That's the other insane thing about that. He pulled that bi-polar shit, ran with a moron, and was brutally lambasted by the media... Yes his success is against every prediction.
Politically speaking, he represented a serious taste for revolution in the new "silent majority." The ultimate protest vote.
In 92, people did realize they were getting screwed by mainstream politicians, and used some fringe lunatic retard to say so.
All it takes, in my book, is the right person to run (with a bankroll). Where are all these whining movie stars when we need them? Step up and run! I expected Arnold to start a trend.