« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Lieberman v Lamont  (Read 9906 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline nacho

  • Hallowed are the Ori.
  • Walter The Farting Dog
  • You're a kitty!
  • *****
  • Posts: I am a geek!!
    • GS
Lieberman v Lamont
« on: August 08, 2006, 04:25:00 PM »
I'm going to try really hard to make the 2006 election interesting, okay?  This may involve drugs, a few murders, and a fast car. 

So today's really interesting update is the equally really interesting Lieberman and his round-for-round really interesting shot-em-up with Ned Lamont.

Lieberman, who needs to die, has been thrown on the ropes by peacenik Lamont.  Lamont, anti-war, is in the lead, thank god.  Lieberman, even before the vote, is already a sore loser.  The game begins tonight in Colorado, Connecticut, Michigan and Missouri.    There'll be a live blog, which sounds agonizing, at http://www.lunchbucketconservative.com for the Michogan primary.

Logged

Offline Tatertots

  • Walter The Farting Dog
  • You're a kitty!
  • *****
  • Posts: 10038
Re: Lieberman v Lamont
« Reply #1 on: August 08, 2006, 04:37:06 PM »
The only agonizing thing here is that anyone actually votes for Lieberman. God.

I'm excited to see Lamot come on so strongly against an incumbent. He's got his head on straight and I think he'll win, despite the god-awful commercials he puts out.
Logged

Offline nacho

  • Hallowed are the Ori.
  • Walter The Farting Dog
  • You're a kitty!
  • *****
  • Posts: I am a geek!!
    • GS
Re: Lieberman v Lamont
« Reply #2 on: August 08, 2006, 04:55:44 PM »
I'm thrilled at how this has become a "race that has become a referendum on the war in Iraq" as the WP puts it.   
Logged

Offline Tatertots

  • Walter The Farting Dog
  • You're a kitty!
  • *****
  • Posts: 10038
Re: Lieberman v Lamont
« Reply #3 on: August 08, 2006, 05:26:43 PM »
After the Reuters blowup, I've become paranoid about the media and have crawled in to my blog shell.

That said, I think the WP is right. There's a huge amount of resentment against the war right now, but the fact that newspapers always present "both sides" equally makes it seem as though the majority is smaller than the minority. I hate that fucking shit. Like when the 10-person "pro-GOP" rally gets more media coverage than the 10,000 person anti-GOP rally during the convention.
Logged

Offline RottingCorpse

  • Old Timer
  • You're a kitty!
  • ***
  • Posts: 24038
  • We got this by the ass!
    • http://www.lonniemartin.com
Re: Lieberman v Lamont
« Reply #4 on: August 08, 2006, 05:44:09 PM »
Lieberman is a cockstain, who has no business in politics.
Logged

Offline Tatertots

  • Walter The Farting Dog
  • You're a kitty!
  • *****
  • Posts: 10038
Re: Lieberman v Lamont
« Reply #5 on: August 08, 2006, 07:44:49 PM »
Logged

Offline Tatertots

  • Walter The Farting Dog
  • You're a kitty!
  • *****
  • Posts: 10038
Re: Lieberman v Lamont
« Reply #6 on: August 09, 2006, 11:29:13 AM »
Lamont wins by 4 or 5% and Lieberman registers to run as an independent.

Good morning!
Logged

Offline nacho

  • Hallowed are the Ori.
  • Walter The Farting Dog
  • You're a kitty!
  • *****
  • Posts: I am a geek!!
    • GS
Re: Lieberman v Lamont
« Reply #7 on: August 09, 2006, 02:42:23 PM »
And the Dems all come out behind Lamont.  Lieberman doesn't have the backing of his voters or his party.

Color me thrilled.

And, also, that secondary and spiritual "anti-Iraq" decision is made.
Logged

Offline Tatertots

  • Walter The Farting Dog
  • You're a kitty!
  • *****
  • Posts: 10038
Re: Lieberman v Lamont
« Reply #8 on: August 09, 2006, 02:53:07 PM »
Well, that was only the primary, so expect round 2 when the real election comes around.

Or is their state heavily Democratic?
Logged

Offline nacho

  • Hallowed are the Ori.
  • Walter The Farting Dog
  • You're a kitty!
  • *****
  • Posts: I am a geek!!
    • GS
Re: Lieberman v Lamont
« Reply #9 on: August 09, 2006, 03:34:57 PM »
This was more an exercise in ousting Lieberman and ruining his career.
Logged

Offline Cassander

  • Cap'n 40 Watt
  • Old Timer
  • Wee Bin Hoker
  • ***
  • Posts: 6087
  • Simmer down now!
Re: Lieberman v Lamont
« Reply #10 on: August 09, 2006, 06:52:38 PM »
i think he did most of the work himself.
Logged
You ain't a has been if you never was.

Offline fajwat

  • Wee Bin Hoker
  • *
  • Posts: 9115
  • Cthulu saves souls for tasty midnight binges.
Re: Lieberman v Lamont
« Reply #11 on: August 09, 2006, 08:08:54 PM »
it's heavily democratic, and liberal dem at that.  But.. if the dems keep their primary votes and you add in a small number of GOP votes for Lieberman....  He's crippled, I'm not counting him out of the race yet.
Logged
"If it were up to me I would close Guantánamo not tomorrow but this afternoon... Essentially, we have shaken the belief that the world had in America's justice system... and it's causing us far more damage than any good we get from it."

-Colin Powell

Offline Matt

  • working through the 1st 10,000
  • Old Timer
  • Wee Bin Hoker
  • ***
  • Posts: 7670
  • tourist
Re: Lieberman v Lamont
« Reply #12 on: August 10, 2006, 12:53:13 PM »
I've said it before: Joe Leiberman is the Democrats' version of a zombie, and they just can't finish the fucker off.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »